This is a staging instance. Full-text downloads are disabled.
 

Publication:
The Effect of Chlorhexidine on Bacterial Contamination of Hall Technique Elastomeric Orthodontic Separators and Gingival Health: A Pilot Study

dc.contributor.authorAlNoman, Nada
dc.contributor.authorAl Halabi, Manal
dc.contributor.authorKowash, Mawlood
dc.contributor.authorHassan Khamis, Amar
dc.contributor.authorSalami, Anas
dc.contributor.authorSenok, Abiola
dc.contributor.authorNassar, Rania
dc.contributor.authorHussein, Iyad
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-30T09:56:53Z
dc.date.available2023-10-30T09:56:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: To study the effect of chlorhexidine on elastomeric orthodontic separators (EOS) bacterial-colonisation and gingival-health in Hall technique (HT) patients. Material and Methods: Prospective invivo pilot clinical study of EOS bacterial colonisation and primary-molar gingival health assessment in 20 patients (mean age 5.45±1.27 years) requiring bilateral HT crowns (40 teeth). One side received 1-minute 0.12% chlorhexidine-soaked-EOSs (Chx-EOSs), and the other side dry-EOSs (NoChx-EOSs). The EOSs were removed five-days later and underwent a bacterial enumeration technique. Plaque (PI) and Gingival (GI) indices were assessed pre-, five-days and three-months post-treatment. Wilcoxon-Signed-Rank/McNemar-Chi-square statistics were used (p<0.05). Results: Baseline unused/packaged EOSs’ sterility check yielded zero colony-forming-units (CFU) per millilitre, but 100% of the used EOSs became colonised by oral-microorganisms. An overall trend of lower mean CFU count in Chx-EOSs (3.415± 0.78 x105 CFU/ml) compared to NoChx-EOSs (6.157±1.48 x105 CFU/ml) was observed (p=0.009). Both NoChx-EOSs and ChxEOSs insertion sites showed evidence of gingivitis with no difference between PI and GI indices by site over time. Conclusion: There was a lower trend of bacterial colonization in chlorhexidine treated EOSs and an occurrence of gingivitis pre/post HT-treatment regardless of EOS type. The lack of difference in the gingival health may be inconclusive due to this pilot’s low power suggesting the need for robust large scale studies.en_US
dc.identifier.other304-2023.35
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mbru.ac.ae/handle/1/1364
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectMicrobiologyen_US
dc.subjectChlorhexidineen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Chlorhexidine on Bacterial Contamination of Hall Technique Elastomeric Orthodontic Separators and Gingival Health: A Pilot Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files